Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chalkboard (typeface)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Chalkboard (typeface)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Violation of WP:IINFO, little notability, no reliable references. ℳøℕø 04:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The complete list of items at NOT#INFO are:
 * Plot-only description of fictional works.
 * Lyrics databases.
 * Excessive listing of statistics.
 * News reports.
 * Who's who
 * FAQs
 * Which of these does this violate?  DGG ( talk ) 05:09, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Incorrect nomination rationale, and all system default typefaces are notable. It's as sourced as it can possibly get without getting into crufty territory.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:17, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, I don't see how this would violate WP:INFO, and it is acceptably sourced. J I P  | Talk 05:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep This font is very commonly used in advertisements, etc making it quite notable. --RaviC (talk) 17:36, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Ref, please? (You may be thinking of Comic Sans)--ℳøℕø 23:07, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Mrschimpf & others.-- SPhilbrick  T  20:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.