Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cham calendar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. I apologize for not looking more closely for sources that verified content in the article already, but it is clear that this is notable and that much of it is verifiable in reliable sources. Everymorning (talk) 15:06, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Cham calendar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This seems to be a hoax. The Cham people do seem to have a calendar, apparently best known for the Kate festival, which is not mentioned in this article, but I couldn't find a reliable source that verifies anything actually in this article. E.g. I googled "Balan tha" -wikipedia and only got false positives, ditto with the alleged name of "Thanuchan". Everymorning (talk) 01:45, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:46, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:55, 4 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - I added a reference, I don't think it is a hoax. Smmurphy(Talk) 03:38, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep the author does not appear to be a hoaxer. Inactive now, so just delete all unref stuff. I did find more refs and added one. - üser:Altenmann >t 09:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, and remove the hoax tag, but also remove the "characteristic" column of the table. The reference "The Cham of Vietnam: History, Society and Art" is reliable and sources everything as far as I can tell except the month names and these strange statements about dragons.  FalconK (talk) 12:22, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I removed the hoax tag. I'm not sure if I should have let someone else do it, but I felt it was time. Smmurphy(Talk) 13:34, 5 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.