Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chamber of Public Secrets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Chamber of Public Secrets

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Couldn't find any independent RS covering this, and not even passing mentions. Most, if not all, of them are just primary sources. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 20:58, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 22:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 18:45, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not pass WP:GNG and thus WP:CORP because there is no significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources. Every reference in the article is a WP:PRIMARY and I was unable to find anything else during my search outside of the article itself. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:07, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find any independent secondary sources. Bishonen &#124; talk 20:14, 17 November 2018 (UTC).
 * Delete per nomination. There's seemingly a plethora of references but upon closer examination the facade crumbles: The majority of the references are to primary sources, mostly to the subject's own website; there's a link to an article about one of the two artists rather than the subject (here); the announcement of an upcoming event (here); plus some dead ends (e.g. here). Nothing to hang something on. -The Gnome (talk) 16:42, 21 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.