Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chan Te-tang

Chan Te-tang was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete

Does not show up in Google except in copies of our page. Article doesn't say why he is important. Rmhermen 01:07, Sep 26, 2004 (UTC)


 * Not enough of an article here to establish notability, or anything else, apparently. Delete. Fire Star 03:05, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * D local judge, not notableWolfman 04:09, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable judge.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 05:42, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Apparently only known locally. C R  17:17, Sep 26, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. If he is well-known, someone shuld enlighten us. Dieter Simon 23:03, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable Jongarrettuk 00:46, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't seem to be a figure of much importance. Izalithium 5:23, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete What has he done and why is he important? --ScottyBoy900Q &infin; 18:13, 04 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.