Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chanan Krivisky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Chanan Krivisky

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. BLP of unestablished notability.  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 06:58, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  —  Baseball   Watcher  17:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  —  Baseball   Watcher  17:45, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —  Baseball   Watcher  17:46, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  —  Baseball   Watcher  17:47, 31 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The notability of Chanan Krivisky has been established already, as can be seen in the edits. This article has already been removed from View AfD] once before, no recent edits warrant it to be marked for deletion again. [[User:Brewcrewer|(Brewcrewer) is calling said article into question due to one of the editors comments on another article which he re-edited. (Brewcrewer) harsh techniques should be noted as backlash, not objective editorial responsibility. User talk:Chonye is taking responsibility to clean up article. brew  is submitting for deletion based on my edits on other articles.  Please leave this one alone, it is a valid piece.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samuelgreen18 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC)  — User:Samuelgreen18 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment Please keep this AfD on  track with  relevant  comments only. Discuss the article and how it  meets or does not meet Wikipedia policy, and not  the editors. Avoid use of small  text unless determined by  the site software. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:41, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I removed the small font size formatting to make Samuelgreen18's comments more legible. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:53, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails every  Wikipedia notability  criterion,  especially  WP:ACADEMIC. Article is a vanity  page, promotional,  point  of view pushing, and original  research. No  reliable sources, or verifiable sources or extensive coverage found. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:55, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article makes no real assertion of notability—it lists the schools he's gone to and things he's done, but none of them are particularly noteworthy achievements. Additionally, I don't know what "circumnavigating" the peak of Mount Hood is supposed to mean. Does that mean he walked a circle around the sign marking the highest point? Either way, no one made a note of it. I'm struggling through the promotional material, but it's looks like he's a local rabbi and community center leader. Not someone who meets the WP:GNG, in any case. — Chromancer  talk/cont 04:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, blatant vanity page for a non-notable person. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 18:21, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC.  I may take a few minutes and edit down the fluff to see if there is anything I'm missing but it looks like a non-starter. Joe407 (talk) 03:38, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Krivisky fails to qualify as notable according to Wikipedia's standards. Yehoishophot Oliver (talk) 05:53, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete --- I don't think every rabbi needs a Wikipedia page, especially without strong sources which there are none. Is there really a reason Chanan should've be created on Wikipedia? SwisterTwister (talk) 06:22, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.