Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chance (logic)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   my head asplode looking at this thing. - I mean, G1 speedy deleted. The Bushranger One ping only 16:56, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Chance (logic)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article is unreferenced and, it seems to me, entirely nonsensical--not quite gibberish, but just this side of it. Shelf Skewed  Talk  04:27, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't agree this is "not quite" gibberish – it is the pure and unadulterated stuff. Possibly written by a computer program imitating Sokal. In fact, I suspect that the title ("Chance") is a reference to the procedure used to generate this. --Lambiam 16:15, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Patent nonsense. Northamerica1000 (talk) 15:58, 5 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 15:34, 8 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as patent nonsense. I have marked it with db-g1.  Peacock (talk) 15:50, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.