Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chancellor of China


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep, "unsourced" doesn't mean "should be deleted". Article simply needs cleanup. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:22, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Chancellor of China

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Has been totally unsourced since June 2006; it therefore doesn't pass WP:NOTE, WP:VER and WP:RS. It's got to go, basically. Rambutan (talk) 17:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, important historical office that obviously CAN BE referenced. AFD is the wrong venue for going about this. --Dhartung | Talk 18:53, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep and close WP:RS and WP:V are not grounds for deletion, inappropriate venue for reference request of clearly notable topic. ~ Eliz 81 (C)  19:08, 17 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.