Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandigarh Baptist School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as firm consensus has always shown secondary schools to be notable and acceptable (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  23:56, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Chandigarh Baptist School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am aware that schools are inherently notable but the way the article is written is 100% promotional and attempts to use Wikipedia to both promote the school and serve as a website about the school. Full of WP:PEACOCK language. For example, the code of conduct at the school is NOT encyclopedic material. For the article to be up to standard it would have to be 100% re-written. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. What in the opening paragraph would have to be rewritten? If the content following that is promotional then just remove it from the article, but that would still leave a perfectly valid neutrally written stub. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 20:52, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: IMO, this school meets WP:GNG. I've removed unsourced contents, re-wrote few lines and added two refs (there are many available though).
 * Hi, please take a look at the article and if your concerns has been addressed, you can withdraw and close this afd. Or you can further explain your deletion rationale. Thank you. Anup   [Talk]  11:10, 21 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. The issues brought up by the nom have been fixed by some editors. Also, WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   05:30, 25 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.