Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandler Morgan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:47, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Chandler Morgan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page seems to be self-promotion for a non-notable individual according to Wikipedia's rules. One of the two sources is her own website and the other is her employer's. This is my first time following this procedure so please forgive if I have done it wrong. Lbr123 (talk) 22:43, 29 May 2017 (UTC) chan
 * Delete Does not pass WP:CREATIVE (which includes journalists), and can't seem to find reliable sources on her, She fails basic GNG.  FITINDIA   22:56, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.   FITINDIA   22:57, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.   FITINDIA   22:57, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom's findings. Welcome to AfD... we need more people willing to work here. Legacypac (talk) 23:00, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:15, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:16, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:05, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:16, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - I think the page is actually well-written for a new posting, and so I feel the accusation of promotional intent is a bit unfair. That said, very much a case of WP:Too soon, I agree with nom on the notability per an uninspiring google search. Although with her zeal for her career, she may be notable soon - she literally let herself get bit by a poisonous snake for a PSA bit (wow). Yvarta (talk) 20:55, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - sorry, but this is a local reporter in the 127th largest media market in the United States. Bearian (talk) 00:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.