Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandlings School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Cothill House. --MelanieN (talk) 22:58, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Chandlings School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't see that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Is a primary school, please see WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Possible alternatives to deletion are redirecting to List of schools in Oxfordshire or merge and redirect to Bagley Wood. Sending WP:APPNOTE to. Boleyn (talk) 20:44, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge to Bagley Wood, Seems IMHO better to Merge as Bagley Wd can then be filled up. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:00, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge to Cothill House - Not sure why the bloody hell I went with Bagley WD as as noted below it does make more sense to merge to Cothill. – Davey 2010 Talk 00:28, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 03:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge to Bagley Wood per Davey. The usual outcome.Charles (talk) 09:08, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Or it could be merged to Cothill House which is the "parent" school.--Mervyn (talk) 09:53, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment - as a school going only up to 11, it is a primary school, not prep school, which would normally be 8-13, preparing pupils for Common Entrance to Public Schools. I note from the template that we have articles on a number of preparatory school.  It would be odd to single this one out for deletion.  Cothill House seems to have a number of schools scattered about the country, so that merger there is hardly appropriate.  Bagley Wood is a slightly odd article on what was an extra-parochial place.  If this were merged in it would unbalance that article, unless the school occupies a very substantial part of that area.  Peterkingiron (talk) 18:46, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment, whether WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is irrelevant; it is not odd to look at the notability of one article. There may well be others which meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 21:14, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - I agree with Peterkingiron that merging this article with its educational 'parent', Cothill House, makes more sense than merging with a wood. Sources do not appear to exist for it as a 'stand alone'.Pincrete (talk) 10:27, 19 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.