Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandpur Chandipur Riyajul Ulm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. While schools are often considered notable, this unaccredited one apparently isn't. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Chandpur Chandipur Riyajul Ulm

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A school that fails WP:GNG and WP:VERIFY - is not listed on the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education's list of accredited schools. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:36, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:41, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. The longstanding consensus of the community as reflected in WP:NSCHOOL (a guideline, not an essay) is that schools are held to the same notability requirements as other organizations, namely, that they have received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Cf. ("The common theme in the notability guidelines is that there must be verifiable, objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention from independent sources to support a claim of notability.");  ("[N]otability is demonstrated by the mustering of evidence that an article topic is the subject of multiple instances of non-trivial coverage in trustworthy independent sources."). Topics that do not meet the notability requirement "are not retained as separate articles." WP:FAILN. See WP:WHYN and WP:NOTDIRECTORY for an explanation of why we have this requirement. In this case, there is virtually no qualifying coverage of the subject, so the article must be deleted.  Rebb  ing  14:07, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete An unaccredited school that fails WP:GNG. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  00:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:09, 23 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.