Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandrashekar swamiji


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 18:59, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Chandrashekar swamiji

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article of a lesser known person, a couple of primary links and a lot of fluff and praise. Govindaharihari (talk) 09:14, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:17, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:17, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:18, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 * No mention of the gold issue and police raid that is reported a couple of places, I still don't think he is notable even if the article would be rewritten neutrally. Govindaharihari (talk) 09:20, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 * KEEP Chandrashekar swamiji is a International Vastu Consultant and Scientific Astrologer. Visit his website to know more about his achievement and social activities [Articles http://chandrashekarswamiji.com/#!/media]. He is official Vastu consultant to World Trade Centre (WTC) which is been rebuilt after terrorist attack September 11,2001. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.141.106.36 (talk) 09:38, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet general notability criteria, seems like the sources have mentioned him as pass by and does not stress any notability Shrikanthv (talk) 10:13, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as WP:G11 else WP:BLOWITUP if he somehow meets GNG. - The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 08:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I've gutted the article to remove most of the promotional terminology, and having searched for sources, I reckon there's just about enough out there to warrant an article. It seems pretty borderline, though, and could do with some attention from editors who know more about Inidan topics than I do. Yunshui 雲 水 09:01, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * KEEP Sri Chandrashekar swamiji spreading true essence of Indian heritage through Vasthu and Jyothishya consultancy to the world. Common People like me were aware of his achievements at international level and his social service activities across Karnataka state only through regional news papers. Surprisingly found all those Karnataka regional articles at one place on search [Articles http://chandrashekarswamiji.com/#!/media] as proof. In my opinion he deserves to take position in Wikipedia for his notable achievements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PradeepKamath025 (talk • contribs) 16:37, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮  JAaron95  Talk  18:16, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:FRINGEBLP, any biography of a living person who advocates fringe theories must be written in a scrupulously neutral fashion, and must summarize what high quality reliable, independent sources say about the person. We have no such coverage available about this astrologer, so the topic is not notable and the article should be deleted. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  01:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Coming back to this, two of the keep comments are single focus users regarding this article Contributions/PradeepKamath025 and 14.141.106.36 both with glaring WP:COI issues if you review their contributions. That only leaves the single weak keep comment from User:Yunshui all else that has no COI is leaning delete. Govindaharihari (talk) 21:00, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Cullen328.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:42, 20 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.