Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Changning (prince)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 15:39, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Changning (prince)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability is NOT INHERITED Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 07:21, 14 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Changning (prince) will never become a major article, but it doesn't deserve deletion. I agree that if Changning's only distinction was his link to the imperial family of the Qing dynasty, he wouldn't deserve his own wiki (per WP:ITSA, which you cite). But Changning was a major commander in an important event of the early Qing dynasty, namely the Qing campaigns against their Dzungar-Mongol enemy Galdan. Changning also has his own biography in a major biographical dictionary (Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing Period) and in the Draft History of Qing, two reference works that are considered reliable sources when writing about late-imperial Chinese history. Let me add a few more details about Changning's life and the campaigns he took part in. Thanks for testing the validity of this new page, by the way! Stubs like this one should be tested more often to see what they can really yield. Cheers, Madalibi (talk) 07:54, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, I've added the extra information to the page. It should make the article look less stubby and more clearly not a candidate for deletion. Madalibi (talk) 08:20, 14 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep on the evidence produced by Madalibi, clearly notable under military notability guidelines, as a senior political figure, and GNG. --AJHingston (talk) 11:48, 14 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 14:43, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 14:43, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 11:18, 21 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per Madalibi - seems to be a notable historical figure. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 11:16, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  —Philosopher Let us reason together. 11:16, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.