Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Channel Chasers (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No prejudice against re-creation with an appropriate plot summary and sources to establish notability. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 19:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Channel Chasers
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This television episode does not appear to meet its notability with only a few sources, but not enough to provide it, all nothing but no reception from reviewers with possibly original research or fancruft. JJ98 (Talk) 05:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Also note this article was previously nominated for deletion almost five years ago and the result was withdrawn and merge. JJ98 (Talk) 05:36, 22 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect it unless significant reception information can be found. TTN (talk) 19:36, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 23 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to The Fairly OddParents (season 4) or delete. Either is acceptable.  Google turns up no reliable sources or reviews. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:34, 23 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak keep and sandblast It seems this episode did receive a 2005 Annie Awards nomination. Not all of the series episodes did so, so that's something to consider. In expanding searches, I was able to find it had some coverage... not all is trivial.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 08:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:55, 30 September 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.