Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Channel V India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  12:32, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Channel V India

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of significance Tal Brenev (talk) 19:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 21:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 21:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep as meeting WP:CORPDEPTH, perhaps weakly, per and http://www.indianexpress.com/news/channel-[v]-launches-fiction-show-roomies/642885/ . (The second link is not hyperlinked and needs to be copy-pasted to a browser, because the " [v] " in the article's title creates a hyperlinking error on wiki.) There are also many sources that cover shows on the channel, although they don't discuss the channel itself in-depth. Examples of the latter include: http://www.indianexpress.com/news/rajiv-lakshman--plays--for-channel-[v]/552471/, , , , , etc. For more sources, see V&x=-1243&y=-63&mod=dsearch&onSubmit=Submit this search for Indian Express articles. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep as passes in WP:V and WP:N, I've found references in this article, see...     :-  Chander  For  You'''  16:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:17, 11 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per above. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: Its a television channel aired on national level that too in a country like India which isn't tiny in anyway. What more "significance" does nominator want? §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 05:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.