Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chant Noël: Chants For The Holiday Season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. After being relisted three times, there an obvious consensus to not delete (non-admin closure)  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 03:37, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Chant Noël: Chants For The Holiday Season

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I found no notability for this album. Fails WP:MUSIC. SL93 (talk) 01:29, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:50, 30 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Theopolisme ( talk )  01:50, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 16:59, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T  C  N7 JM  09:07, 16 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep or redirect/merge  - This album peaked at 3rd position on the Billboard Top Classical Album chart in 1994. This may be sufficient to meet WP:NSONG and WP:MUSIC. Certainly, if not, then the article should be merged with Chant (Benedictine Monks of Santo Domingo de Silos album) which is clearly notable. CooperDB (talk) 12:46, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * After taking a look at Google News (which I should have done immediately) I was suprised to see reviews and/or commentary from The Dallas Morning News, the Lexington Herald-Leader and The Wichita Eagle as the nominator said they found "no notability". This is enough to meet WP:GNG without the need for WP:MUSIC, and is almost certainly only a portion of the contemporary coverage which did not get indexed by Google. I change my opinion to a full keep and suggest that perhaps the nominator review WP:BEFORE. CooperDB (talk) 15:26, 21 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per CooperDB. Enough coverage and chart performance exists to go past the bar for notability. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 02:03, 23 August 2013 (UTC), Revised 02:04, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.