Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chantal Leverton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Escala (group). Fritzpoll (talk) 21:33, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Chantal Leverton

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

All contents of the article can already be found in the article Escala (group). Cxz111 (talk) 13:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The author seems to be copying the Escala page and creating articles for all of its individual members in the same fashion.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:09, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:11, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Escala (group) per nom.  [ジャム] [ t  -  c  ] 14:52, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and Redirect. If and when she gains notability on her own, the page can be resurrected, until then, the group page is good. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 19:26, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is some sourced information about her on her own. It might be that it should be done the other way around: shorten the part of this article about the group. Debresser (talk) 01:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * There isn't enough sourced information about her to make an article out of it. If you removed all the information about Wild and Escala, there would only be a short section about her - that isn't enough to justify an article. The sourced information should be moved to the section on the Escala article.  [ジャム] [ t  -  c  ] 08:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep member of both Wild (band) and Escala (group). While most of the content should be removed (the article should be about her and not Escala as it is now, the Escala article is for that) that is not a reason for deletion is she is notable. Duffbeerforme (talk) 14:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.