Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chantel Osmond


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Sam Blanning(talk) 18:21, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Chantel Osmond
I am pretty sure this person is not notable. MrFi s  h Go Fish 19:30, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete for now, but article could use some expansion. 56 films is not enough for WP:PORN, but I might be persuaded if more is added to this article. Wildthing61476 21:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete but send her round here to be consoled.  Dei zio  talk 21:18, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. Keep if it can be shown that she made a "notable" film (something other than the pulp stuff her industry cranks out), or if she has appeared in a notable number of films. -Amatulic 22:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, or delete all under her category. What's so different about this person as oppossed to all the other women listed under the category of bondage models. They all look the same to me. Either keep it, or get rid of the whole category and its contents.--7seconds 17:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Note - User's first edit.  Dei zio  talk 18:07, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Hi 7seconds, welcome to Wikipedia. Articles are not eligible to be kept just because similar articles exist on Wikipedia. Articles about individuals should comply with WP:BIO and WP:BLP (in this case WP:PORN can also be considered), keep votes may be discounted by the closing admin if they fail to address those guidelines. Alternatively, if you see an article about a non-notable individual anywhere on Wikipedia, feel free to nominate it for deletion. Give me a shout on my talk page if you want to know more.  Dei zio  talk 18:07, 20 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable. Encyclopaedia Editing Dude 11:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.