Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chantelle Houghton (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy keep. — FireFox • T • 17:08, 25 January 2006 

Chantelle Houghton
Not a proper celebrity, started by Willy on Wheels sockpuppet, obscene article Gaveldoom 11:24, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Note Articles for deletion/Chantelle Houghton was closed as a keep two weeks ago. Proto t c 15:58, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Very, very weak keep. May easily be a delete in 3 months.  Dubious origin and perceived obscenity are not legitimate reasons for deletion.  GWO 11:34, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Willy on Wheels sockpuppet started this!!! It's obscene I tell you! --Gaveldoom 11:36, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - recently been discussed and nothing has changed. Nomination does not appear to be in good faith. --Whouk (talk) 11:41, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Indeed, the nominator seems to have been deleted. Can we speedy keep please? --Whouk (talk) 11:47, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - huge media presence at the moment. As for being obscene, someone needs to get out more... --Oscarthecat 11:48, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Whouk. Ruby 12:12, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Blimey, this is obscene?!?...let me send you some URL's nominator! *Evil Grin* Jcuk 12:21, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Obviously, and obscene!!?????
 * Keep Leave it a year - if she has returned to being a non-entity by then, that's the time to delete the entry. Right now, she's in every national newspaper every day.
 * Speedy keep, nominated by a random vandal, his next edits were putting afd notices on FreplySpang's user and talk page. - Bobet 13:12, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per Bobet. Essexmutant 13:42, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep --Terence Ong 15:28, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep and close, bad faith vandal nomination. Proto t c 15:57, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.