Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaos (2005 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. (NAC) --J.Mundo (talk) 01:07, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Chaos (2005 film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The only real 'notable' thing about the film is that Roger Ebert gave it a 0 star review, the producer wrote back and Ebert responded, which the director later used to promote his film. Is that enough to warrant an article on it? CyberGhostface (talk) 18:24, 5 April 2009 (UTC) Deletion withdrawn--CyberGhostface (talk) 15:16, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It would easily satisfy even the ridiculously high bar set in WP:MOVIE of wide distribution and review by "two or more" nationally known critics., and even that's just a rough guideline. It would not have been reviewed by Roger Ebert if it had not been a theatrical release.  Mandsford (talk) 18:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 19:19, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The film was released and was reviewed by The New York Times, Variety and Hollywood Reporter, as confirmed by Google News: . Pastor Theo (talk) 23:45, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep clearly meets WP:N and WP:MOVIE. Recommend a speedy keep. --J.Mundo (talk) 04:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.