Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaos Generations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete Richardcavell 01:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Chaos Generations
Chaos Generations is a really terrible amature game being designed with an EZ-Maker engine known as RPG Maker 2003. It has no importance or notability whatsoever, and it's inclusion on wikipedia is genuinely absurd. As someone familiar with the subject matter, (and a dedicated wiki reader) I took it upon myself to take "executive action" and remove this article's self promoting content. If I was in error as to the procedure of such an edit, I apologize, but seriously, there's no reason for this amature game to be advertised on Wikipedia, which is primarily an academic and cultural informational resource.

It's purpose of inclusion here is solely for advertising, which I understand is not what wikipedia is for. The article's creator was also the game's creator. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Leg10n (talk • contribs).


 * Weak delete - I found this article listed on CAT:PROD despite having a partial AfD against it. Doesn't appear to be notable per Notability (software) (Only 600 odd ghits) - but it isn't the worst article I've ever seen. Could be cleaned up. If someone cleans it up - please drop me a note, and I might change my vote. Megapixie 03:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete At the time I PRODded it, there was no contest under AfD, only that it had been selected as such. (i.e. no one was against it) And don't get me wrong, Chaos Generations isn't a terrible game- but that's not what this is about. Wikipedia isn't the place for advertising. Oh, and delete under WP:NOT and/or NN.VideoWizard2006 07:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete It's an advertisement (the creator of the article has never edited another page) for a yet-to-be-released 2D game by a development company that doesn't even have its own web site. That basically screams non-notability. -- Kicking222 04:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT.--Peta 06:22, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. nn -- GWO
 * Delete Article is pure advertising and the software os NN per WP:SOFTWARE Ydam 12:22, 8 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk  to Nihonjo e  02:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  02:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.