Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaos Marauders


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  13:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Chaos Marauders

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

NN board game. Fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 13:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. UtherSRG (talk) 13:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: I will work to see what else we can find, but for now I will note that it does have a review in Casus Belli #42 (Dec 1987): BOZ (talk) 13:45, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Polish review from pl:polter.pl. English review from Bell of Lost Souls  (about). Borderline but if we add this with BOZ's Casus Belli review, leaning towards week keep vote. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  09:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and United Kingdom. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  09:07, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: I have rewritten the article in a more arm's-length encyclopedic tone, and added new sources. Guinness323 (talk) 06:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly does not fail WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:07, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per the above comments, and I believe the rewrite addresses the concerns of the nomination. BOZ (talk) 11:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.