Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaos Theory (essay)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete, WP:SNOW, WP:NOR. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Chaos Theory (essay)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:OR. PROD tag removed by an IP. No sources. KuroiShiroi (talk) 02:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT a webhost or blog and no original research policy. --TeaDrinker (talk) 04:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Essay. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete in accordance with WP:NOT#3. Coldmachine Talk 07:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete as self-admitted original research. J I P  | Talk 08:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obvious OR with nothing to distinguish it from the Chaos theory article, except for being of a far lower standard. Anaxial (talk) 11:17, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete It fails the basic goal of Wikipedia. - Mgm|(talk) 12:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above and WP:NOR.  ♪Tempo  di Valse ♪  14:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Obviously delete. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 16:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of above. 99.184.128.247 (talk) 23:35, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Appears to be a WP:OR essay. Can we just speedy close and be done with it? Plastikspork (talk) 02:53, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.