Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaos communications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Chaos communications

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Tagged for notability since 2010. A single reference that doesn't have an inline doesn't indicate that this concept is called by this name. Fails WP:GNG, though a merge to synchronization of chaos would be a find WP:ATD. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:55, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Mathematics. UtherSRG (talk) 15:55, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep A WP:BEFORE-style search shows multiple secondary reliable sources for the topic: the review articles Applications of Chaos in Communications, Chaos communications-principles, schemes, and system analysis, and A brief survey and some discussions on chaos-based communication schemes, and chapter 27 "Principles of Chaos Communication" in the book Signal Processing for Mobile Communications Handbook. And more with a bit more searching. These sources establish notability of the topic per WP:GNG. The article needs improvement, but with good sourcing available, there are no insurmountable problems. Hence keep. --  17:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per Mark viking's argument, basically. The article isn't in great shape by any stretch of the imagination, but there's a topic here. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 17:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per Mark viking. More sources include: Privacy in Two-Laser and Three-Laser Chaos Communications, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, July 2015 — Digital Communications with Chaos by W.M. Tam (table of contents here). The topic is notable. HenryMP02 (talk) 19:38, 29 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.