Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaoscope


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:25, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Chaoscope

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Software with no sign of notability. No hits in Google news archive nor Google books. This would be an A7 speedy, if only software were eligible for that category of speedy deletion. But it was prodded and deleted once already, in 2007, so now we have to go to a full AfD. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:50, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:20, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * A straight google search reveals a fair few hits, but these mainly consist of a couple of press releases and a lot of blogs and galleries of images made using the software. Given the number of hits in google it seems fairly popular; perhaps it has been featured in a graphical design magazine or something similar at some point. I can't find anything though, so it's probably best to delete it, and if such a reference can be found later, it can be recreated as having addressed the issue.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  16:40, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I couldn't find a reliable source to establish notability. Axl  ¤  [Talk]  11:02, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.