Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chapel of Our Lady, Echt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kj cheetham (talk) 11:07, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Chapel of Our Lady, Echt

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not appear to satisfy WP:NBUILDING as there is no significant in-depth coverage from WP:RS, third-party sources to demonstrate notability. – Meena • 08:22, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. – Meena • 08:22, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep it’s a national monument in the Netherlands (see this ref). Mccapra (talk) 09:55, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Christianity.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:20, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Dubious -- We do not allow an article on every listed building. The reference cited is a very brief register entry, though that certainly is authoritative third party coverage.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:50, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * According to WP:GEOFEAT, yes we do. Artificial geographical features that are officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level and for which verifiable information beyond simple statistics is available, are presumed to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:40, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I worked a bit on the article to provide inline citations and additional info. The building is a National Monument. As a church, it has an interesting and well documented history, including as a pilgrimage site. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 00:23, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly meets WP:GEOFEAT as a heritage-listed national monument. Also meets WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:39, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as it is a historic building and recognized monument. Pika voom  Talk 06:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOFEAT and all above. gidonb (talk) 13:09, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is a Rijksmonument and I note that (at least now) it is properly included in Category:Rijksmonuments in Limburg.  It and others in that category should be used to create a table for the Limburg ones, within List of Rijksmonuments.  The membership of that list currently skews greatly to molen (windmills) due to good work of WikiProject Mills.  I will try to add a historic sites infobox (Rijksmonuments are set up already within wp:HSITES system) to the article. --Doncram (talk) 20:19, 7 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.