Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chapter 2 (House of Cards)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. It's clear that no useful discussion will happen with the pages being bundled like this instead of them being nominated individually based on each page's merits. SoWhy 15:03, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Chapter 2 (House of Cards)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am also nominating the following related pages:

I believe the articles fail to meet the relevant notability guidelines. They primarily consist of plot and cast sections, with a few lines being devoted to the reception of each episode. It seems obvious to me that it was initially intended by the creator of these pages for every episode of House of Cards to have its own stand-alone article, but this idea was shortly abandoned. Furthermore, all thirteen episodes of the season were released on the same day, so focus was given on the season as a whole. On the other hand, i understand keeping the article Chapter 1 (House of Cards) for the first episode of the series, which meets the notability guidelines, it is sufficiently developed and could serve as an extended introduction for the readers. -- Radiphus  06:25, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Question What is the reason for these not becoming redirects to House of Cards (season 1)? Thincat (talk) 08:04, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Seeing as the episode articles were created almost 2 years ago, i thought it would be better to discuss about it first. This process would also delete the history of the pages, so we wouldn't have to think about it again. -- Radiphus  08:25, 1 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment What criteria under WP:BUNDLE led you to nominating these together?
 * Identical content with different titles - Nope
 * Hoax articles - Nope
 * Same articles - Nope
 * Identical manufactured product - Nope
 * Sounds to me like this needs a procedural close and each one nominated individually -  Galatz Talk  10:57, 1 May 2018 (UTC)


 * BUNDLE offers the points you've listed above as examples, not as the definitive criteria. It also states that in cases where you will find a number of related articles, all of which you feel should be deleted together, it would be helpful to bundle all of them together into a single nomination. That's exactly the case here. According to the reasoning i have offered above, i wouldn't want let's say "Chapter 3" to be kept and "Chapter 6" to be deleted. This could have happened, had i nominated the articles individually. Either all of them should be deleted together, or all of them should be kept as the result of this discussion. -- Radiphus  11:19, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I disagree because I see certain ones expanded more than others with more sourcing. I also think its kind of silly to delete these when Chapter 1, most of the article could apply to all of season 1. I haven't gone line by line through it but I bet most of that info is already on the season 1 page. -  Galatz Talk  11:22, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It would be appropriate to first read the articles, and then state your opinion regarding whether they should be deleted or not. As i said, i believe that either all of them should be deleted together or none of them should. I will not make any changes to the nomination, which you can always oppose for your own reasons. -- Radiphus  11:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I am not sure what in what I wrote makes you think I have not read them, but I already gave my opinion -  Galatz Talk  13:16, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:16, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 13:19, 9 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment The bundled nomination here seems perfectly well justified. I'm neutral as to the outcome here; AV Club has articles on each episode  and I'm sure other sites do as well, but that's not really WP:SUSTAINED coverage.  The bar to keep TV episodes is generally very low. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 03:05, 12 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.