Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chapters in Batman: The Dark Knight Returns


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Chapters in Batman: The Dark Knight Returns

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The entire article is simply an extensively detailed plot summary, the lead sentence even acknowledges this fact. A sufficient summary already exists in the miniseries' main article, there's no need for this article, which serves no other purpose than to go into excessive, unnecessary detail. Calgary 23:09, 22 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions.  -- Artw 23:48, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT's rule against detailed plot summaries. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 23:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Redudant, appropriate coiverage given in main article. Artw 00:06, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Redundant and infringing copyright from excessive plot: WP:FICTION and WP:PLOT. (Emperor 00:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC))
 * Delete as per the above. John Carter 00:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Way too much plot and too little real content. —  Wen li  (contribs) 02:45, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT#PLOT - Not the place for completely in universe plot summaries Corpx 04:06, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. Shoester 05:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator, Commissioner Gordon would have wanted it this way. Burntsauce 18:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete — too much plot, redundant with main article, not really any room for out-of-universe context or analysis. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 18:34, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

'Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks!' -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.