Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charak Pharma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete by  per WP:G11 and WP:G12. (non-admin closure) Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  11:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Charak Pharma

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable sources whatsoever, not asserted notability. The references used are simply company listings, and don't actually evidence notability. --George (Talk &middot; Contribs &middot; CentralAuth &middot; Log) 11:58, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. --George (Talk &middot; Contribs &middot; CentralAuth &middot; Log) 12:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

delete This should never have, IMO, passed AfC. The tone is overly promotional, the 'sourcing' is very poor, and (very signifigantly) it has substantial material copied directly from here. While it's 'plausible' that an acceptable article could be written about this company, given it's age, this is not it, not at all. This is very close to being a copyvio speedy, if not actually over the line. WP:TNT applies. Revent talk 12:17, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment No. I think its not exactly like that, may be user have taken reference of the above linked material for the lay out/grammatical tone. I will give my opinion only after through inspection and verification. -- Mahensingha (Talk) "Thanx n Regards" 15:58, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The 3rd, 4th, and 5th sentences of the lead are verbatim except for changing 'the company' to 'their'. The list of countries they have manufacturing locatins in is exactly the same, including the words 'and many more' at the end. shows that the 'list of features' is a 61 word direct copy. Yes, it's like that.  Revent talk 19:15, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * (correcting myself) Where I said 'manufacturing locations' I should have said 'products available'. Was tabbing back and forth at the time. Revent talk 19:39, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

delete I am really shocked to see all this. Thanks for your good vision Dear Revent .-- Mahensingha (Talk) "Thanx n Regards" 19:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 15 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as blatant advertising. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 00:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete -G11 and G12. It is an WP:ADVERTISEMENT that fails WP:CORPDEPTH. I had in mind to move it back to draft space, but since it does appear to be a blatant advertisement and some copyvio, a start from scratch would be more appropriate. -I will strongly suggest you to take a break from AfC project and spend some time to learn basic Wikipedia's guidelines, core-content policies and AfC reviewing instruction.  Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  08:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Anupmehra, Thanks for the suggestion. I will surely apply it.-- Mahensingha (Talk) "Thanx n Regards"</I> 11:08, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.