Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charisse Melany Moll


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No prejudice towards continuing discussion on actions other than delete, so long as there is consensus on the relevant talk page(s). Kurykh (talk) 21:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Charisse Melany Moll

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non-notable &#40;&#40;&#40;The Quixotic Potato&#41;&#41;&#41; (talk) 16:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a mere list of Miss World contestants as the source is not enough to establish this one sentence article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Miss World 2007 § Contestants, where the subject is mentioned, per WP:ATD-R. Valid search term. North America1000 02:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Wrong venue As established by Northamerica1000, WP:DEL8 is not a valid del-reason for this topic.  Since a redirect out of AfD is not binding, content contributors should decide if the presumption of non-notability is a reason to redirect, merge, or leave as a non-notable standalone article.  See WP:Deletion policy and WP:Deletion policy.  Unscintillating (talk) 03:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a person who represented her nation at the highest level of competition in her field.  It is reasonable to presume that there are reliable sources beyond those that already appear in the article, even if those additional sources have not yet been found.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  06:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per NewYorkActuary. She has represented her country at the highest level in her field, which is the standard for most biographical articles. If we can call on our Dutch-speaking editors, I am sure there are more sources about her in the Suriname press. Moreover, with cases like this where sources are likely available but not easily or in English, we should be conscious of Wikipedia's systemic bias against non-Anglo topics and err on the side of keeping and improving.--TM 12:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep per NewYorkActuary --- PageantUpdater (talk) 04:47, 17 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.