Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charity Engine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 17:48, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Charity Engine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources / references, non notable.  Puffin  Let's talk! 16:01, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Article itself needs some help but I found at least three articles to establish notability., , --FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 18:32, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 6 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 22:03, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

 Is official partner of major charities and described on their sites. eg. Oxfam, MSF , CARE. Currently 14 news articles referenced on its press page. . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.89.101 (talk) 04:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC) There's a BBC article about Charity Engine, that can easily be found — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.114.44.201 (talk) 12:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 11:36, 20 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Incubate  This article has only the home web page for a citation, which means that readers cannot WP:Verify the article's content.  Unscintillating (talk) 18:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Changing to incubate, since a notable topic without sources can be improved, and incubation gets this unreliable article out of mainspace. Unscintillating (talk) 03:47, 25 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep — there are primary and secondary sources (like BusinessInsider, ReadWrite, BBC, TheNextWeb ecc); I don't see a valid reason for asking a AfD and the aforementioned issues could be improved without the need of a AfD — Toffanin (talk) 09:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.