Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlene Arthur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Charlene Arthur

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Good faith, but unsourced WP:OR. Unencyclopaedic tone, eg worth noting... she would have caught the eye  Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:04, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, terrible article, but Keep, and with thanks to for writing her up--the editor is obviously a first-time Wikipedian and this is reflected in the style and formatting. But as a subject, she is clearly notable, as a quick Google Book search shows (I added one). And with that, I'd like to turn this over to, the program's Senior Women's Article Rescue Mission Executive Director. Next up, DYK. Drmies (talk) 17:54, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * keep. Looks rescued; the added book cite has a solid write-up about her. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * , please look at the article again. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:46, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks great. I thought this might be salvageable, but it's not an area I have any knowledge of. Thanks to all those who have transformed the page. I'm happy for this AFD to be withdrawn or closed as a keep, not sure which is the approved procedure Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.