Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Albert Crampton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:10, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Charles Albert Crampton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Currently unsourced with only one link on the entire page, and other searches bring up very little, or references to different doctors of the same name (not the same since they lived in the mid-20th century.) Also fails WP:NPOL on the mayoral position. SportingFlyer  talk  17:50, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - Per nomination.  VitalPower | talk  19:39, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 03:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 03:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 03:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete- unless I'm missing something here, the article doesn't even make sense. Why would the Internal Revenue Bureau have a chief chemist?--Rusf10 (talk) 03:28, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - the IRS probably had a chief chemist to look into trariffs on chmeicals. That doesn't make him pass WP:PROF. Bearian (talk) 16:31, 20 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.