Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Augustus Fitzroy Fitzsimons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:49, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Charles Augustus Fitzroy Fitzsimons

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Subject is not notable or insufficient reliable sources are cited to establish notability. Reads as a personal genealogy. MrX 01:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This is one step short of WP:PROD.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BennyHillbilly (talk • contribs) 06:08, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTDIR para. 2. Charles Fitzsimons is not notable per WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO nor WP:BASIC. He may be the illegitimate son of a notable person but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. --Joshuaism (talk) 01:51, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete As the author of the page, I have read these discussion points and concede that the page does not meet the requirements, so I agree that it should be deleted. Sorry for any inconvenience. - MosomIV 5:46, 24 July 2012 (AEST)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MosomIV (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 24 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, interesting story, but not really notable enough for inclusion here. Lankiveil (speak to me) 22:44, 28 July 2012 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.