Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Bach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 11:54, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Charles Bach

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Most coverage seems promotional, as does the page. The two least promotional-looking sources are dead links. Cannot find any WP:SIGCOV in the past decade and believe he fails the WP:GNG. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:33, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 06:33, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions.  Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 06:33, 3 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - I have added archive links to the dead sources (dead links aren't eo ipso reason to delete), but even then they do not help show notability. One is a passing mention, and the other is clearly promotional. I can likewise find no significant coverage of this performer in reliable, secondary sources. ƒirefly  ( t · c ) 10:19, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG, not enough sources available. GooeyMitch (talk) 18:49, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:50, 3 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable magician. We do not have a passing of GNG here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:58, 5 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.