Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles E. Abramson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Mgm|(talk) 08:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Charles E. Abramson

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Procedural nom. This was prod tagged and deleted as part of User:Oo7565's random-deletion-tagging spree; as this is a potentially noteworthy figure and Oo7565's prod reason ("unreferenced, no sources on the internet") appears to have missed the ten different references in the article, I've undeleted it to set up a procedural discussion. Procedural nom so I abstain. –  iride scent   21:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Procedural keep. Given that the original reason for nomination was based on an incorrect assumption, I see no reason to continue this discussion. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 02:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep No valid reason  for  deletion given. -- J mundo 03:48, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep needs a bit of cleanup, but the prodder broke the limits of my good faith assumptions so I see no valid reason to delete.  Them From  Space  06:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.