Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles E. Rice, III


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Kusma (討論) 02:18, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Charles E. Rice, III
Subject is a former District Court Judge (a county-level position); does not meet WP:BIO notability criteria: Political figures holding international, national or statewide/provincewide office or members of a national, state or provincial legislature. Prod tag was removed by author.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:56, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BIO and Google test. 19 Ghits. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag of Texas.svg|30px]] 02:04, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, note that meeting WP:BIO requirements is not a necessary criterion for notability (for example Ray Nagin doesn't meet them, but no one would deny he's notable). However, it looks like advertisement. --Saforrest 02:46, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Ray Nagin passes alternative tests. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag of Texas.svg|30px]] 02:50, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Interesting point; I'd never question the notability of a mayor of a large city, yet it doesn't seem to meet the WP:BIO sentence I quoted. (Side note: I think Nagin would also pass WP:BIO by virtue of media attention).  OhNo itsJamie Talk 03:18, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Federal district court, or state district court? If he was a federal district court judge he'd be definately notable. &rArr;    SWAT Jester   [[Image:Flag_of_Iceland.svg|18px|]]  Ready    Aim    Fire!  04:26, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I certainly agree that a federal district court judge is notable, but Rice seems to have been a state district court judge. Joe 05:11, 9 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, nn-bio. --Ter e nce Ong [[Image:Flag of Singapore.svg|30px]] 05:03, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Joe 05:11, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete He is a former state district court judge and this does look like advertising. Montco 05:50, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. If he were a federal judge, he would say so, and he would not be working in private practice now. Local judges are not notable without additional accomplishments. Serving on a committee means nothing, if he has no notable accomplishments as a result. NTK 10:41, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  14:14, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Question sorry if this is the wrong place to ask, feel free to post on my talk page any answers. What is notable about a judge? Being English I have no idea what the difference is between a federal or state district judge, much less why either of them should be notable. I cant see any reason I would do a biography on anybody working at Harrogate Crown Court for example.... Cheers. Jcuk 16:06, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Reply I don't think there is a set policy on judges. State judges can be notable and Federal judges can be obscure.  But your state district court judge is going to be more likely to have your run-of-the-mill cases like car theft, assault and the occasional murder.  Sometimes state judges like Lance Ito become quite notable because of a notable trial, O. J. Simpson for instance.  A Federal judge requires you to get a Presidential appointment, which can end up becoming political, and you also get a shot at constitutional issues.  If someone could point out a case with major implications that Judge Rice presided over, that would change my opinion.  So as in everything here at Wikipedia, it's very subjective, for me I like a rule of thumb.  Montco 02:19, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep Even district court judges are notable within a state legal system. Plus, different states have different titles for "district": for example while at the federal level districts are the lowest tier and circuit courts are the appellate branch, in the state of florida circuit courts are the original jurisdiction courts and district courts are appelate branches. Anyway, it grants him notability. I do have to say however, all Federal Judges are notable as they receive their appointments from the president of the united states. &rArr;    SWAT Jester   [[Image:Flag_of_Iceland.svg|18px|]]  Ready    Aim    Fire!  06:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * This individual is now retired according to the law firm website, www.ricefamilylaw.com. I don't see it as an advertisement and I don't see that a man who made numerous legal decisions including those upheld by the NC Court of Appeals is not sufficiently noteworthy to be included in Wikipedia.  He was one of the first judges in the Wilmington area to put a reported in jail for contempt!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.184.50.131 (talk) 00:14, 22 March 2010 (UTC)