Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Eugene Williams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sourced reference that he was indeed a world champion, the fact that he was a survivor of the Titanic wreck is secondary. (non-admin closure) Ifnord (talk) 01:07, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Charles Eugene Williams

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable passenger of the Titanic; minimal RS coverage outside of this single event. –dlthewave ☎ 16:41, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Soutar was one of the best players ever and was so devastating with his serve they changed the rules in the US to one serve instead of two. Leave this article as it is and do not delete. History needs to be preserved, not covered up or eliminated. Once deleted, it may never re-surface ever again. (Uer: ssader)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssader (talk • contribs) 18:42, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Did the nominator actually read the article? He is a World raquets champion, the titanic note is an additional piece of information. How can a sports world champion not be notable?Racingmanager (talk) 17:06, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:01, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:02, 1 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG. Yes, a lot of the gbooks sources cover him as a Titanic survivor, but they state he was a notable passenger as a world champion. Iffy★Chat -- 09:21, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - agreed, Passes GNG as a champion Racket player. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:14, 5 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.