Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Fagge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. v/r - TP 00:21, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Charles Fagge

 * – ( View AfD View log )

fails WP:BIO. as he lived over 70 years ago, gbooks is a more appropriate search engine. . most results simply are in the list of several doctors. he was a president of a few surgical societies, but don't see how this makes you notable. the best coverage is an obituary in a journal, but besides that I don't see any coverage in the broader media and press nor is there anything really notable about his career above the many many good surgeons out there. LibStar (talk) 07:19, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Actual notability not established. However much I admire a well-written historical article, it is difficult to see why he might be notable. PubMed has a fair number of papers written by him. Perhaps the creator/main editor could clarify. JFW &#124; T@lk  18:32, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep I think his Presidency of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (1933) and the delivery of the 1928 Bradshaw Lecture and then 1936 Hunterian oration might be sufficient to help pass WP:Prof ie partially satisfying Criterion 1 invited lectures at meetings of national .. scholarly societies, where giving such an invited lecture is considered considerably more prestigious than giving an invited lecture at typical national and international conferences in that discipline; named lectures or named lecture series.  (Msrasnw (talk) 19:51, 4 July 2011 (UTC))
 * Keep from passing WP:Prof as above. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.