Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Goh (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Helpful  One  12:07, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Charles Goh
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

fails to establish notability with sufficient reliable sources on this ghostbuster


 * Delete absolutely. Wikipedia must lose the paranormal cruft. ScienceApologist (talk) 08:05, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep enough media references to prove notability even if what he does is utter nonsense. --Blowdart | talk 08:41, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions.   —Artw (talk) 08:54, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * article rewritten with reliable sources and references to demonstrate notability —Preceding unsigned comment added by Firet (talk • contribs) 08:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge, else delete with Asia Paranormal Investigators. He has zero notability outside this organization and nearly all of the material is simply a repeat of information in Asia Paranormal Investigators.  Minor fame or being mentioned in a few press reports is not the same as being notable. Phil153 (talk) 14:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.