Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Hernick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Charles Hernick

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Political candidate who fails WP:GNG, article is also clearly promotional. JamesG5 (talk) 01:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:Politician. SW3 5DL (talk) 04:14, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as absolutely nothing convincing and only a mere listing. SwisterTwister   talk  05:57, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, obvious A7 candidate ("He addresses high-profile issues affecting natural resources and economic development by informing policy changes, improving program implementation, and managing projects effectively" are fine words, but since it's unsourced and presumably from a press release isn't remotely approaching a credible claim of significance.) &#8209; Iridescent 18:49, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment I originally A7ed it but another editor disagreed, which is why I went via AfD. JamesG5 (talk) 20:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah—I should have guessed who the editor in question was. &#8209; Iridescent 20:52, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.