Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Justiz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:18, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Charles Justiz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced WP:BLP of a writer, whose primary notability claim is having written a book that was optioned for a film that still hasn't actually been released six years later. This is not a solid notability claim that would hand a writer a free pass over WP:AUTHOR all by itself -- but nothing else stated here meets any other notability criteria, and the sourcing is not getting him over WP:GNG: it's referenced primarily to primary sources, blogs, Q&A interviews in which he's speaking about himself and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things or people, not to notability-supporting coverage about him. There's also a likely conflict of interest here, as the article was created by an editor whose only other contribution to Wikipedia was an equally poorly sourced article about the subject's wife. Literally nothing here is "inherently" notable for the purposes of establishing that he passes our subject-specific inclusion criteria for writers or aviators, but the sourcing isn't even close to getting him over WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 23:26, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 23:26, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 23:26, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:39, 8 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:AUTHOR and fails all other standards just as Nom states.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.