Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles K. Poole


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete per consensus and as an unsourced BLP per WP:BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:28, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Charles K. Poole

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:AUTHOR. Book is listed at  Gbook,  but  all  the sources I  found  were blogs and social  networks -  not  WP:RS. Article looks like a plug for a book and a a public affairs and reputation management firm. Kudpung (talk) 16:00, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  —Kudpung (talk) 16:04, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete publishing your blog in book form is not enough to satisfy our notability requirements and I can't find any significant coverage of this author. Smartse (talk) 16:11, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. WP:COI. Jimmy Pitt   talk  16:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment (ec) The book was published by Xlibris Corporation (print on demand). I found a review published by The St. Louis American. I'm afraid it isn't enough to establish notability. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:19, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as article fails notability criteria for authors. Publishing one book compiled from blog posts is not enough. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  18:14, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not sufficiently noteworthy to merit a standalone article; spam.   -- Rrburke (talk) 13:38, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.