Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Lee (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Drmies (talk) 04:21, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Charles Lee (musician)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Declined Prod. Prod Reason was "Uncited stub article about musician of dubious notability." Prod decline was "alleges he was a band member in notable bands; rv prod". Notability is not inherited. Subject participated as a backup member (Non-headlining) in notable bands, but has not distinguished themselves individually. Questionable on the WP:MUSICBIO account. Hasteur (talk) 01:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 05:07, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the above; no evidence to suggest that the subject is actually notable at present. As Usual, however, note that it's early in this person's career, and it's possible that they might become notable in the future; in that case, an article might be warranted. Not yet, however. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:57, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks to the nominator who notified me about this AfD. I removed the proposed deletion because, the article states that the subject "has played in numerous projects including Filter, Theory of a Deadman, Loser," etc.  That would be enough to pass bullet # 6 in WP:BAND, which states the subject "is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles."  However, upon further review, the assertions are not verifiable.  He was not considered a member of Filter, and Charles Lee Salvaggio was a fill-in for tours by Theory of a Deadman.  He is not listed on the website for Loser.  Having done my research, I have to conclude that he's not notable. Delete. Bearian (talk) 20:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bearian. Looks plausible on the face of it, but doesn't amount to much w/r/t notability, once you try to find sourcing to really back it up. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 05:29, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Legis (talk - contribs) 08:44, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in reliable, independent third-party sources. Should such sources be integrated into the article feel free to leave a note on my talk page and I'll take another look. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:51, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.