Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Maire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 09:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Charles Maire

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Very minor character that hasn't appeared in prin in nearly 70 years. At best, this should be redirected to a list of minor characters. Fails notability test Konczewski (talk) 00:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. There appears to be a painter of the same name by a Google search, who might be notable.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 07:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No secondary sources to establish notability or provide real world context. Deleted articles are not necessarily "salted", so an article on the painter could be created afterwards, if sources allow. If any user doesn't want to wait, build the page in your sandbox. Either move the article when it's ready or when the current one is deleted, whichever comes second. Jay32183 (talk) 08:52, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions.  -- Hiding Talk 10:04, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as fails WP:FICT. It is a general consensus on Wikipedia that articles should not be split and split again into ever more minutiae of detail treatment, with each split normally lowering the level of notability. What this means is that while a comic may be notable, it is not normally advisable to have a separate article on a character from the comic. --Gavin Collins (talk) 14:38, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:FICT.   jj137  ( Talk ) 16:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - merge if the merged list is notable. :-)  Stwalkerster  talk 11:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.