Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles McDonald (Scottish Entrepreneur and Model)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. with salt. Cirt (talk) 09:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Charles McDonald (Scottish Entrepreneur and Model)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Articles on Charles McDonald and Episode Management have been deleted a number of times for various CSD reasons, mostly advertising and non-notability. Episode Management fails google test as does Charles McDonald. Besides one very fluffy piece in the Bolton Evening News there are no reliable sources. I am taking this to afd rather than nominating for CSD (again) because there are claims of notability, although I'm not convinced that they are especially compelling. Deadly&forall;ssassin 21:49, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: It looks like Episode Management has been speedy deleted as I was writing this.  If the article is recreated I would like to add it to this AFD nomination. --Deadly&forall;ssassin 21:54, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable self-advertising by the editor concerned, who appears to have that one small mention in the Bolton Evening News, and have the idea that unrelated links somehow justify what looks like a fantasy. . . dave souza, talk 22:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete When the best press you have is your article on Wikipedia.... P HARMBOY ( TALK ) 23:32, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:RS. Undead Warrior (talk) 02:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, Snow, and Salt Let me count the ways... no actually ... he fails to meet the notability and verifiability criteria as he hasn't 1) had significant roles in multiple notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions. 2) had a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.  3) made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment 4) received a notable award or honor, or been often nominated for them. 5) The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field. There's more but, I won't clutter the AfD with them all. Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:51, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, we can verify quite a bit here. He's "hunky" "5'10" and "makes the ladies swoon" - he's attracted the wrong type of woman in the past, but now he's looking for "a down to earth personality, good looks and intelligence.". So, I'd be tempted to vote keep, except in reality he's not any more notable than me. So delete, just your typical Scotsman.--Scott MacDonald (talk) 09:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.