Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Meade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  TheSpecialUser TSU 01:16, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Charles Meade

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

An IP editor, tagged this article for deletion and left the following statement on the article talk page: '''How is this notable for WikiPedia? Appears to be more of an agenda then an Encyclopedic style entry.''' As the IP editor made a good faith attempt to nominate the article, I am completing the nomination process on their behalf, though I do not think deletion is likely. Monty 845  16:30, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 4 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep as a nomination without any policy reasons for deletion, and with no WP:BEFORE check. In fact, the article has multiple references, and more can easily be found, e.g. this one. An oddball, but certainly a notable oddball. The article can probably use some editing, but that's not a matter for AfD. -- 202.124.72.174 (talk) 10:07, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per GNG. --Nouniquenames (talk) 14:39, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep or possibly merge with Meade Ministries (which needs expansion). As I read it, Meade was the founder of a movement that otehrs regard as a cult.  Perhaps, now he is dead, this will wither, but that does not change its value.  I have to admit that if this was about a standard church minister, I would probably be for deleting as NN.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:52, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.