Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Miller international tournament


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 17:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Charles Miller international tournament

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This was a once off match, believe it fails WP:SPORTSEVENT Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per above. I agree; it fails WP:SPORTSEVENT in that it lacks reliable sources, most of the information is merely a list of stats more than it is notable information that makes the article worth being encyclopedic, and it does not appear to be a notable championship.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   06:52, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 19:30, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - As a one-off tournament this appears to be a non-notable friendly competition. No indication of GNG and major WP:NOTSTATS concerns. Fenix down (talk) 12:36, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable one-off friendly tournament. IJA (talk) 16:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone above - Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  21:35, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.