Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles O'Toole


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America1000 00:07, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Charles O'Toole

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

does not meet the general guidelines for notability Interlaker (talk) 00:07, 3 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Can't find any sources beyond the one NYT mention which isn't enough to satisfy the GNG. Spectacularly fails the Google test. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:47, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 5 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete (with no possibility of moving elsewhere or draft/userfy as there's not much to begin with) - I agree, my searches found basically nothing and browser immediately gave the NYT link among the first; this has existed since September 2007 with basically no significant improvement since and it's also seems he may not be very well known so there's no much info. SwisterTwister   talk  05:19, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I found a few references and added them, although the Irish Times piece appears to be a "roundup". Also seems to be some background information on him here . In 2008, responding to the Carlo Rossi Make Something campaign, he made the "Carlo Rossi Jug Cluster table". However, his company was wound up in 2011, so I don't think there will be enough for him to appear notable using WP:CREATIVE or WP:GNG. Drchriswilliams (talk) 15:01, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Too much reliance on primary sources. The NYT article just has a quote from O'Toole and is entirely about other issues, much of it a clear case of Kellerism in which accusations against Roman Catholic institutions are thrown out as fact and insinuation is used instead of study of the sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:26, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Inadequate coverage in reliable sources to support notability.   B E C K Y S A Y L E S  18:24, 9 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.