Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Perniciaro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Charles Perniciaro

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsuccessful primary candidate for Congress, and no notability as a dermatologist or as a installer of Christmas lights. None of his articles has been cited more than 67 times,--most fewer than 10  DGG ( talk ) 22:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:06, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:06, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)


 * delete fails GNG. The way this was created was obviously with some kind of undeclared COI.  He apparently played piccolo in high school.  So delete per WP:PROMO as well. Jytdog (talk) 03:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Having intimate familiarity with a subject is not a rationale for deletion, nor is failure to declare personal acquaintance an example of Conflict of Interest. "Promotional" is only promotional if it is promoting something. Carrite (talk) 16:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Yep, and if you can't see how promotional this is and has been since it was created, I cannot help you. You may not be aware but in the field of medicine, dermatology, plastic surgery, and for some reason orthopedic surgery, are probably the three most crassly commercial fields with respect to doctors out there hyping themselves and their practices, and this article is/was par for the course. Jytdog (talk) 05:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC)


 * delete not notable as a medical practitioner or as a politician. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 05:13, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability not yet there. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being non-winning candidates in party primaries — he would have to have won a seat in the State Senate, not just be a failed candidate for one, to pass NPOL. But the only other potential claim of notability here, being selected as "Practitioner of the Year" by his medical colleagues, is sourced only to a primary source press release from the professional society and not to a WP:GNG-passing volume of media coverage for the distinction. Bearcat (talk) 06:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Jytdog. 22:36, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not enough non-routine coverage that isn't a primary source. Thus, he fails our general notability criteria. RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録  13:26, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unelected politician. I enjoyed reading the bit about being a professional christmas lights installer, it is plausible that in the future notability could be extended on these grounds if the coverage becomes larger than a single human-interest piece. Carrite (talk) 16:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The nominator incorrectly described this individual, he lost in a run for the state senate nomination, not the US senate. State senate is a state legislative position, so he would not be notable unless he won the general election. The POV-pushing in the description of his run is why we cannot support having articles on every candidate for even national legislatures, let alone sub-national ones.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:22, 23 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.